I am a member of the last class of the Mount Hermon School for Boys, having graduated in 1971. Like thousands of others, I benefited immeasurably from my experience there. As many here have expressed, it was a life transforming experience on so many levels. I sent my daughter, Julia ‘02, there. She spent her entire student life there on the Northfield campus. I was strongly opposed to the closing of the Northfield campus.
I do owe much to this school and I am reluctant to criticize it any manner. Be that as it may, however, I must stand and express my shock and disbelief at this transaction.
First, the school closed a campus that means a great deal to thousands of alumnae and alumni. The pain that this caused has been written about by many and will not be expanded upon here. But, we accepted it and looked to move on.
Then, at the end of the process, the school gave the campus away.
When I saw the press release in the Boston Globe stating the sale price of $100,000, I thought that it had to be a misprint. Surely a couple of zeros hadn’t made it into the article. I was wrong. But, we are saving millions of dollars by way of “cost-avoidance” by jettisoning the campus. It is good to avoid cost. However, this campus and our heritage deserved better than to simply be cut away like a cancer or a nonperforming asset.
The process of divestiture and the end result of the transaction amount to an embarrassment for this school.
In my opinion, this is the product of a failure of leadership going back some years. After all, didn’t the school create a “Freshman Village” on the Northfield campus just the year before the school decided to close the campus?
Regardless of market conditions and/or the academic landscape, one cannot absolve the leadership of this school for failing to properly plan for and to execute an appropriate, and truly beneficial, disposition of the campus. Where was the contingency planning?
How did the leadership box itself in so much that it had to accept such an insignificant sum of money for the campus at the end of the process? Was there no plan in place to keep the campus as part of the school if no reasonable financial offer to purchase came in? If not, why not?
Institutions of the magnitude of NMH require managers with the skills needed to address the problems that have faced the school over the last several decades. I do not think that the school has had enough of such managerial skill. For sure, it has been a long path that has brought us to this place today.
I believe that there is another problem as well. It manifests itself in the control of information and the execution of “spin” in its dissemination. When Head of the School Mueller went on his “town meeting” tour of the country a few years ago, to “discuss” options for the future of the campus, it was clear that the die had already been cast. At the meeting I attended in Boston, numerous inquiries and suggestions from the alumnae and alumni in the audience were either dismissed or side-stepped. Despite the assertions that “no decision had been made” I, among others, left that meeting strongly believing otherwise. One might have said that “it was all over but for the voting.”
Today, we are asked to accept glowing pronouncements about how fantastic this disposition is for the school. According to the school, we should all rejoice. I say that if the leadership of our school had announced to us “Good News – we as an institution have engaged in an act of charity and have given the Northfield campus away to a worthy institution for a worthy cause” then fine. It might not have pleased everyone but it would have been more acceptable for being forthright. The “spin” applied to this disposition is undignified and not befitting a great institution.
Further, if the leadership of our school had announced to the alumni that all it was going to take to buy the campus was $100,000 and a good and worthy idea, heaven knows what the response might have been. Certainly, we will never know.
Before the school decided to divest Northfield, we were told that the school was financially solid. We are told now that the school is even more so. I hope this to be the case, as I wish the new NMH the longest of life possible. I also wish the C.S. Lewis College the greatest of success and call upon it to do great deeds; but that is in their hands.
As to what is in NMH’s hands, I hope that the school acts to secure the strongest and most competent of leadership for the long term. Certainly, institutions change over time and all of this may have been unavoidable. However, I fear that at some point, some time ago, the school found itself with leadership that could not manage the assets of this great school. Unfortunately, it was determined that the assets must go rather than ensuring that the best possible leaders and managers come to the school.
Let us not allow this to happen again.
Chester J. Winkowski MH 1971